Change is needed.

For all topics that don't fit into another category. Note that we cannot promise that any of these posts will be responded to by our development team.
Locked
Uriah
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:21 am

Change is needed.

Post by Uriah »

I have now spent 55hrs using MSFS2020. Ignoring all the problems within MSFS2020, the graphics are just perfect and depicts the world we live in very well. The terrain and colours, water and clouds in FS2020 just kill P3Dv5.1, and in my opinion P3D is dead in the water unless Lockheed Martin do something drastic to get P3D up to the level of MSFS2020 or even better it. I took a flight in P3D this morning and I could not fly longer than 5 minutes and exited the program. There is I'm sorry to say no comparison and it is sad.
User avatar
Martyson
Posts: 15184
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:08 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Martyson »

Uriah wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:56 pm I have now spent 55hrs using MSFS2020. Ignoring all the problems within MSFS2020, the graphics are just perfect and depicts the world we live in very well. The terrain and colours, water and clouds in FS2020 just kill P3Dv5.1, and in my opinion P3D is dead in the water unless Lockheed Martin do something drastic to get P3D up to the level of MSFS2020 or even better it. I took a flight in P3D this morning and I could not fly longer than 5 minutes and exited the program. There is I'm sorry to say no comparison and it is sad.
I fly both as well with ActiveSky in P3D.

Which aircraft are your flying in both sims?
Best Regards,
Vaughan Martell PP-ASEL (KDTW)
Uriah
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:21 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Uriah »

I also have ActiveSky and it does not compare to MSFS2020.

Aircraft:
Airbus A320, Cessna 172, TBM 930, PA44 Seminole, Citation CJ4, Savage Cub, Zlin.

I do not bother with any of the Boeings as they have some serious flight dynamic problems. The Airbus is pretty reasonable now with the FlyByWire mod.
User avatar
Martyson
Posts: 15184
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:08 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Martyson »

Which aircraft do you fly in P3D?
Best Regards,
Vaughan Martell PP-ASEL (KDTW)
User avatar
JorgenSA
Posts: 6008
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:17 am
Location: 5 NM ENE of EDXF

Re: Change is needed.

Post by JorgenSA »

Uriah,

Let's just say that opinions on how MSFS2020 and P3D compare differ widely.

Jorgen
System: i5-12600K@4.9 GHz, ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-I motherboard, 32 GB 4800 MHz DDR5 RAM, Gainward RTX 3060 w/ 12 GB DDR6 VRAM, Windows 10 Pro.

All views and opinions expressed here are entirely my own. I am not a Lockheed-Martin employee.
Uriah
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:21 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Uriah »

Martyson, in P3d I fly A318/A319/A320, most of the aircraft from Carenado, some Areosoft.
Uriah
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:21 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Uriah »

Hello Jorgen
Graphics wise, P3D cannot and does not compare to MSFS2020. I have every ORBX Region that is available installed in P3Dv5 and that made P3D usable and reasonably OK in a visual way but without ORBX and other 3rd party addons P3D just cannot compare. I do not like Microsoft one little bit as they are bullies and spy on everything we do ( that's why they developed Windows 10 ) but they started Flight simulator (all those years ago) and have taken it to a different level with every new release, and now with the help from their developers ASOBO. MSFS2020 is still racked with problems but they will get there and are working on it whereas Lockheed Martin bought the rights to FSX and have just about done nothing with it, except create a 64bit version. Graphically P3D is 10 years behind cosidering the technology that is available today. I am not looking for an arguement but facts are facts. You all have a nice day.
Uriah
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:21 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Uriah »

Some screenshots - LPFR (Faro) TropicalSim MSFS 2020/P3Dv5 ....... I'll let you decide.

Image

Image

Image

Image
goodperson36
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:26 pm

Re: Change is needed.

Post by goodperson36 »

Uriah if your going to come on here and bash prepar then you need to move on I am really surprise that the admins on prepar didn’t take your ruthless comment down. MSFS 2020 is a game but far from a real simulator enjoy okay but don’t come on here saying how bad prepar is okay..sick of people like you bashing oh prepar is not good enough the scenery doesn’t look great In prepar MSFS is the best blah blah blah ....move on dude nobody cares...
User avatar
JorgenSA
Posts: 6008
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:17 am
Location: 5 NM ENE of EDXF

Re: Change is needed.

Post by JorgenSA »

"MSFS 2020 is a game" - I totally agree. I had it on my system for about 30 minutes, then I demanded my money back.

If people like it, let them brag about how good it in their own forums.

If people do not like P3D, they can just uninstall it and leave the rest of us alone.

Jorgen
System: i5-12600K@4.9 GHz, ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-I motherboard, 32 GB 4800 MHz DDR5 RAM, Gainward RTX 3060 w/ 12 GB DDR6 VRAM, Windows 10 Pro.

All views and opinions expressed here are entirely my own. I am not a Lockheed-Martin employee.
User avatar
Martyson
Posts: 15184
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:08 am

Re: Change is needed.

Post by Martyson »

I enjoy flying my favorite aircraft (VFR/IFR training flights) using Xplane11.5 P3Dv4.5HF3, P3Dv5.1HF1
and MSFS [2020].


Notes:
I just recently uninstalled MSFS9 and MSFSX.

Some of the aircraft I fly (default and payware) are only available in specific simulators.

MSFS [2020] now has VR.

Image
Best Regards,
Vaughan Martell PP-ASEL (KDTW)
Locked